We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.
Advertiser Disclosure
Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.
How We Make Money
We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently of our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What is the Road Map for Peace?

By O. Wallace
Updated May 23, 2024
Our promise to you
Historical Index is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At Historical Index, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject-matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

The Road Map for Peace is an energetic, optimistic plan for achieving peace between Israel and the Palestinian people. It was conceived by an international “Quartet” of superpowers: the United States, Russia, the European Union (EU) and the United Nations (UN). The earliest version of the Road Map for Peace was first outlined by President George W. Bush in 2002, when he proposed an independent, democratic Palestinian state that peacefully coexisted with Israel. The plan was proposed in the hope of securing a home for Palestinian refugees, bringing democracy, and of course, stability to the Middle East.

When the Quartet formally met to lay out the Road Map for Peace, they did so in three main phases, with each phase based on the performance and progress met in the previous one. Initially, there were some basic requirements that had to be met before the Road Map could be initiated. One was that the Palestinian Authority must make reforms toward a democratic system of government, and most importantly, eschew terrorism and violence as a means of manipulation and retribution. In addition, Israel was required to accept and support Palestine as a state and to leave settlements in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank.

The three phrases are as follows:

Phase One:(planned completion date: May 2003)

  • End of violence by Palestinians, or those affiliated with the liberation movement.
  • Palestinians must hold democratic elections.
  • Israel should withdraw from Gaza Strip and West Bank settlements.

Phase Two:(planned completion date: June-December 2003) In this phase, an International conference will be held to start the rebuilding of Palestine by discussing its economy, establishing Israeli-Arab links, setting borders, and rebuilding infrastructure.

Phase Three:(planned completion date: 2004/2005) In this phase, the second International Conference will finalize borders, decide on who “gets” Jerusalem, and arrangements will be made on how to handle Palestinian refugees.

The Road Map for Peace was widely accepted in both the West and the Middle East, and started energetically with concessions on both sides. On 19 March 2003, Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) leader Yasser Arafat appointed Palestine’s first Prime Minister, Mahmoud Abbas. This was a big step, because most western governments believed that Arafat had been a major roadblock to peace. Israel in turn released several Palestinian political prisoners. Unfortunately, the spirit of cooperation would not last long—violence resumed until a cease fire was declared on 29 June 2003.

By 1 July 2003, the Road Map for Peace was “on” again when Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon and Abbas spoke out together in support of the Road Map. Israel withdrew from Bethlehem, and the U.S. promised to give $30 million US Dollars (USD) to help Palestine rebuild.

With Arafat’s death in 2004, western leaders were hopeful that peace would move forward, unencumbered by old hostilities and allegiances. In February 2005, a summit was held with the Palestinians, Egypt and Jordan, where they reiterated their support of the Road Map. Sharon’s momentum was ended when in January 2006, he was incapacitated by a serious stroke. In his place, Ehud Olmert pledged to carry on his vision and resume work on achieving the Road Map’s goals.

A major obstruction was encountered in 2006 when Hamas (an Islamic Resistance Movement) won the majority of seats in the Palestinian parliament. Because the United States and Israel have stated that they would not deal with Hamas due to their pledge to destroy Israel, it seems that the Road Map for Peace has stalled. Hostilities continued through 2006 between Israeli forces and Hezbollah in Lebanon, as well as Hamas forces in the Gaza Strip. As of 2007, not even phase one of the Road Map for Peace has been completed.

Historical Index is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.
Discussion Comments
By anon354480 — On Nov 08, 2013

There will be no peace in the Middle East until the Prince of Peace returns, reestablishes the Throne of David and sets up His 1,000 year reign as foretold in the King James Bible.

By anon17581 — On Sep 02, 2008

We are in the last quarter of 2008 and the so called Road Map is not even placed of step I. The Quarter of super-powers has shifted. Why only them, why not all the members of UN. Israel and Palestine are also members of UN. Are there any nations who belong to EU and not in UN?

The globe wants peace, but the definition of peace and its understanding as well as their solution cannot be imposed. Yes, the major players are only two. But the world also takes the side of either of the two. This duality can never bring singularity. Neutrality is essential and that can be acceptable.

Issue is who are neutral and recognized by all. Sweden and Switzerland are the two oldest nations who can represent each of the two warring groups. Create a road map and document in UN. We cannot bring democracy of numerical superiority. That will break the trust. Achieving a state of non-duality is peace. That is either singularity or pluralistic. I think the message is taken.

Regards, Asesh

Historical Index, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

Historical Index, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.