We are independent & ad-supported. We may earn a commission for purchases made through our links.

Advertiser Disclosure

Our website is an independent, advertising-supported platform. We provide our content free of charge to our readers, and to keep it that way, we rely on revenue generated through advertisements and affiliate partnerships. This means that when you click on certain links on our site and make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

How We Make Money

We sustain our operations through affiliate commissions and advertising. If you click on an affiliate link and make a purchase, we may receive a commission from the merchant at no additional cost to you. We also display advertisements on our website, which help generate revenue to support our work and keep our content free for readers. Our editorial team operates independently from our advertising and affiliate partnerships to ensure that our content remains unbiased and focused on providing you with the best information and recommendations based on thorough research and honest evaluations. To remain transparent, we’ve provided a list of our current affiliate partners here.

What is Spectral Evidence?

By A. B. Kelsey
Updated May 23, 2024
Our promise to you
Historical Index is dedicated to creating trustworthy, high-quality content that always prioritizes transparency, integrity, and inclusivity above all else. Our ensure that our content creation and review process includes rigorous fact-checking, evidence-based, and continual updates to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Our Promise to you

Founded in 2002, our company has been a trusted resource for readers seeking informative and engaging content. Our dedication to quality remains unwavering—and will never change. We follow a strict editorial policy, ensuring that our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts. This guarantees that everything we publish is objective, accurate, and trustworthy.

Over the years, we've refined our approach to cover a wide range of topics, providing readers with reliable and practical advice to enhance their knowledge and skills. That's why millions of readers turn to us each year. Join us in celebrating the joy of learning, guided by standards you can trust.

Editorial Standards

At Historical Index, we are committed to creating content that you can trust. Our editorial process is designed to ensure that every piece of content we publish is accurate, reliable, and informative.

Our team of experienced writers and editors follows a strict set of guidelines to ensure the highest quality content. We conduct thorough research, fact-check all information, and rely on credible sources to back up our claims. Our content is reviewed by subject matter experts to ensure accuracy and clarity.

We believe in transparency and maintain editorial independence from our advertisers. Our team does not receive direct compensation from advertisers, allowing us to create unbiased content that prioritizes your interests.

Spectral evidence was a form of evidence accepted in the courts during the Salem Witch Trials, one of the darkest, most misogynistic periods of American history. This “evidence” held that the devil and his minions were powerful enough to send their spirits, or specters, to pure, religious people in order to lead them astray. Satan’s minions included many “witches” who lived in the Salem, Massachusetts area.

The concept of “spectral evidence” originally arose during the witch trials in Europe. While the English courts acknowledged the credibility of such proof, they refused to prosecute the accused based on only spectral evidence. Sadly, this was not the case in New England.

The American witch hunts began in Salem Village, a European town settled by farmers in what is now Danvers, Massachusetts. In 1689, Reverend Samuel Parris was the minister at the local parish. His nine-year-old daughter, twelve-year-old niece, and some of their neighborhood friends suddenly began having horrible fits. The village doctor declared these poor girls were the victims of witchcraft.

The girls explained that various people in the Salem Village area were trying to lure them into witchcraft. The witches could make their spirits appear to them and could even cast spells upon them. Pressured by the Reverend, the "afflicted" girls eventually pointed their fingers at Sarah Good, Sarah Osburn, and Tituba, who was Reverend Parris’s slave.

As the local magistrates questioned Sarah Osborne and Sarah Good, the girls once again had horrific fits and even claimed to see “specters” right there in the courtroom. It was obvious to all those present that the two accused women were using witchcraft on the girls, and the two females were thrown in jail despite their protests. The slave Tituba, however, confessed under duress to consorting with Satan and stated there were other witches in the area. The girls remained afflicted, the fits started spreading to others in the village, and a mighty witch hunt commenced.

Spectral evidence was considered the primary leading “proof” of a woman’s witchy status, and it became increasingly popular for “victims” to see a spectral shape in a dream or a vision. Witnesses would testify in court that someone’s spirit attacked them, and this spectral evidence would be taken as proof that the accused person was responsible for the attack even though the accused person’s physical body was at another location at the time.

More and more accusations were made, and jails filled up with people from several New England towns, including Salem, Salem Village, Andover, and Topsfield. Dozens of people confessed to being witches under excruciating torture.

Governor William Phips called a special court to try the cases of the accused witches who just would not confess. This court quickly condemned many people to death, mostly by hanging and pressing. A good number of the accused died in jail before they could be tried.

By the beginning of the next year, educated people spoke out against using spectral evidence in court. Perhaps exhausted by the witchcraft frenzy, magistrates disallowed spectral evidence in the courtroom and declared it was insufficient proof to condemn any new accused, bringing an end to the witch hunt.

Historical Index is dedicated to providing accurate and trustworthy information. We carefully select reputable sources and employ a rigorous fact-checking process to maintain the highest standards. To learn more about our commitment to accuracy, read our editorial process.

Discussion Comments

By anon294244 — On Sep 30, 2012

I personally think spectral evidence is a waste of time, energy, and breath. No one cares if you saw someone's uncles, or if the dog tells your best friend to make a deal with the devil. I think if it doesn't make sense it needs to be proven.

Taking people's word for it today would get you shot on sight, therefore, if you want to accuse someone of a horrid crime like choking you with them not even being in the same room, let alone surrounding area, maybe you should set up a hidden camera.

As for these moronic, bored girls of the 17th century, they're all in hell for being idiots so there's no need to worry about them.

By closerfan12 — On Sep 24, 2010

My family can actually trace it's roots back to Mary Eastey, one of the women executed in the Salem witch trials. Understandably, we're not too big on spectral evidence.

By naturesgurl3 — On Sep 24, 2010

@tunaline -- I totally agree. In case anybody's reading this who doesn't know Giles Corey of "more weight" fame, Giles Corey was one of the people tortured to death during the hysteria surrounding the witchcraft trials.

He is famous because he was gradually crushed to death by rocks, and all he kept saying every day when they tried to get him to confess was "more weight".

Also, Betty Parris was one of the accusers who made great use of spectral evidence. Just so you know.

By TunaLine — On Sep 24, 2010

The use of spectral evidence in the Salem witch trials was a tragic shame -- I think any witch hunt, whether the classic Salem witch hunts or modern witch hunts are terrible, but at least today we don't actually take spectral evidence in court anymore.

Of course, it still shows up as anecdotal evidence -- hasn't everybody got a cousin who has a friend who totally saw that creepy kid in their class making a deal with the devil?

People just need to be smart and tolerant so that 200 years from now we're not seen as the same maniacs we consider the Salem witch trial officials to be.

Let's all be Giles Corey, rather than Betty Parris.

Historical Index, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.

Historical Index, in your inbox

Our latest articles, guides, and more, delivered daily.